On the BroadbandReport.com blog, for example, IDI was recently referred to as a “Bell PR firm” with “a long history of trying to trick the public.” I chose to respond to the post with the following comment:

Response from Issue Dynamics

I want to respond to the unsigned story that attacks Issue Dynamics Inc., as a “Bell PR Firm” and then suggests we lie by saying “take their claims with a grain of salt.”

In fact, our on-line business is primarily not for Telco clients, and has included, or still does, among others: The Human Rights Campaign, the Holocaust Museum, and the Center for Community Change, the National Environmental Trust, Amnesty International, NAACP, The National Council of La Raza, the US Chamber of Commerce, The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Mark Warner for Governor, the National Association of Realtors, Harris Miller for Senate, United Church of Christ, and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

IDI has a long and positive history of LEADING in the use of the Net for advocacy by both non-profit and corporate clients. The portrait of IDI by some who don’t know us and who have their own axe to grind in fact paints a completely false picture.

IDI was the first to put the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee on-line. We have hosted early web sites for the Democrats in New York; we sold early technology to the Bradley for President Campaign; we did the first on-line petition to the FCC for a company called Metricom that provided an alternative wireless internet service. We are and have been a leader in developing Internet tools for advocacy for both corporate and non-profit clients.
.
And yes, we do work for Telcos, Verizon, USTA, BellSouth, and we have worked for Comcast, and other corporate Telecom and many non-Telecom clients. The services we offer are diverse but for this discussion the point is we connect our clients with organizations and groups that they might not otherwise work with and help build positive on-going relationships. (We do this for Telcos and for non-profit clients as well.) We offer to build and strengthen connections between business interests and non-profit interests. Or non-profit interests and other interest groups. (e.g. environmental groups with minority groups)

We do not believe the world is “either or.” We sponsor and support a number of pro-labor and pro-consumer organizations as well. It is my view that in civil society constructive relationships that promote dialogue and common values is good.

I suggest that in the last few years some folks whose interests run counter to those of some of IDI’s clients have decided it is a good idea to smear and slander us. A number of folks, including Fred Goldstein, whose post is linked to in the original article, have taken up with others and made this effort a vendetta against both me and IDI. The argument is: if we work with Telco’s we are bad guys.

In fact, I believe our work and our innovation have been responsible for helping to create the best of internet and off-line advocacy and standards. We have been responsible for some great win-win solutions, including provisions in the law that help education and people with disabilities.

We do not engage in spamming, screeds or personal attacks. We do not hire people to post comments and do not encourage anonymity.

Finally, if anyone wants to really get to know us or me, there are places to go:  One is professional and one is personal. People can also Google me under either Sam Simon or Samuel A. Simon – I have never posted under an alias and you will find posts from the early 1990’s forward. (We also ran a bulletin board from 1986 to 1990, called the IDI Board. It was RBBS and much of the then “on line” discussion about the “modem tax” took place on the IDI Board.)

Sam

In this instance, we have decided to add our voice and perspective to this discussion. Our contribution will help readers decide what to make of it all. We think this is a good thing. Ignoring the attack won’t make the discussion go away. So instead, we choose to be a part of it.

As prominent blogger Steve Rubel notes, two high-traffic blogs — Blog Maverick and Seth Godin’s Blog — have disabled the comments feature on their sites. According to Mark Cuban, author of Blog Maverick, comments have “devolved to the point where they add no value.” And while Seth Godin thinks “comments are terrific,” he has decided that they don’t work for him. He does not have the time to review and respond to them and he anticipates that his writing may change over time as he anticipates the responses he will get from his readers. Read the rest of this entry »

Everywhere you turn on the Internet, there’s a link for a blog… On the site of my undergraduate University, my bank, my car manufacturer, Read the rest of this entry »

I regret to inform you that in accordance to the law, as of January 5th, 2005 you are no longer allowed to flame others namelessly through email or blogs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Social Security reform. Dan Rather. Harriet Miers. What do these things have in common? They were all derailed by blogs. Beltway Read the rest of this entry »

Left-leaning blogs have been fairly unanimous in condemning DIck Cheney, Scott McClellan and other Bush administration officials for Read the rest of this entry »

I attended an interesting panel at last week’s Internet Caucus State of the Net conference. The speakers examined the growth of blogging and “self publishing” and the different means for spreading messages Read the rest of this entry »

“Too many folks think “branding” is what airlines do when they repaint the planes every few years, or what banks do when they refresh all the signage in Read the rest of this entry »